Question:

Is the bequest for a foetus from a dying grandfather valid?

The Fatwa

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

The Answer

The Fiqh of the Answer

In his commentary on the ‘Hidāyah’, Imam al-Atqānī (d.758 AH) outlines several conditions for a bequest to be considered valid. These are:

1. The person making the bequest must be eligible to engage in gratuitous transactions.
2. The total value of the bequest must not exceed one third of the deceased’s total assets.
3. The recipient of the bequest must not be among the deceased’s heirs.
4. The recipient of the bequest must not be a murderer.
5. The recipient must exist at the time the bequest is made.[i]

As long as the parent of the unborn child, who is the child of the dying grandfather, is alive, the unborn child would not be considered among the grandfather’s heirs. Additionally, the Fuqahā’, including Imam al-Atqānī (d.758 AH), mention that the criterion for determining whether the recipient of the bequest existed at the time of the bequest is to ascertain if the child is born within six months of the bequest being made. This timeframe is significant because it represents the shortest duration of a pregnancy. Therefore, if the baby is born after six months, there is a possibility that the foetus was not in existence at the time the bequest was made. This is because a foetus is among those entities capable of holding rights. Similar to how a foetus can inherit in certain situations, it can also be the recipient of a bequest. The scholars emphasise the parallels between inheritance and bequest, referring to the bequest as the sister of inheritance.[ii]

As science and technology have progressed, we can now confirm the presence of a foetus in other ways. This means that strictly adhering to the six-month limit might not be necessary anymore, as long as we can prove the foetus existed when the bequest was made. Imam al-Atqānī (d.758 AH) quoted Imam al-Isbījābī (d.591 AH), stating that leaving a bequest for a foetus is permissible as long as it can be proven that the foetus is alive. The traditional method was waiting for 6 months to ensure the baby was present in the womb. The main focus was to ensure the baby’s presence. In the past, technology was limited, but now, with advancements, we can determine foetal presence in other ways. The main principle the Fuqahā’ were interested in is still being met, albeit through different means.[iii]

Note: It has been assumed that the other conditions for a bequest to be valid have been met.

And Almighty Allah Alone Knows Best

Maulana Inaamul Hasan Chothia
Trainee Mufti

Reviewed and approved by
Mufti Faraz Adam
Darul Iftaa Muadh ibn Jabal
www.darulfiqh.com 

DISCLAIMER:

The views and opinions expressed in this answer belong only to the author and do not in any way represent or reflect the views of any institutions to which he may be affiliated.

Arguments and ideas propounded in this answer are based on the juristic interpretations and reasoning of the author. Given that contemporary issues and interpretations of contemporary issues are subjective in nature, another Mufti may reach different conclusions to the one expressed by the author. Whilst every effort has been taken to ensure total accuracy and soundness from a Shari’ah perspective, the author is open to any correction or juristic guidance. On the event of any juristic shortcomings, the author will retract any or all of the conclusions expressed within this answer.

The Shari’ah ruling given herein is based specifically on the scenario in question.  The author bears no responsibility towards any party that acts or does not act on this answer and is exempted from any and all forms of loss or damage.  This answer may not be used as evidence in any court of law without prior written consent from the author.  Consideration is only given and is restricted to the specific links provided, the author does not endorse nor approve of any other content the website may contain.

[i] وأَمَّا شَرَائِطُ صِحَّةِ الوَصِيَّةِ :

فمنها : أَهْلِيَّةُ التَّبَرُّعِ حَتَّى لَا تَصِحَّ مِنَ الصَّبِيِّ والعَبْدِ والمُكاتَبِ فِي حَقّ المَولَى.

ومنها : التَّقْدِيرُ بثُلُثِ التَّرِكَةِ حَتَّى إِنَّهَا لَا تَصِحُ فِيمَا زَادَ عَلَى الثَّلُثِ ، إِلَّا أَنْ تُجِيزَ الوَرَثَةُ ، وإجازتُهم وَرَدُّهُم يَصِحُ بعد الموت ، ولَا يَصِح قبل الموتِ ؛ لأَنَّ الملك بالوَصِيةِ يَثْبُتُ بعد الموت .

ومنها : أَلَّا يَكُونَ المُوصَى له وارِثًا إِلَّا أَنْ يُجِيزَ الوَرَثَةُ، فَإِنْ أَجازَ بعض الورثة ؛ يَنفُذُ بِقَدْرِ حِصتِهِ مِنَ المِيراثِ لَا غَيْرَ .

ومنها : أَلَّا يَكُونَ قاتِلا ، ولو أجاز الورثة يَجُوزُ عندَ أبي حَنِيفَةً ومُحمَّدٍ ؛ لِأَنَّ المنعَ لِحَقِّهم كما في وصيَّةِ الورثة

وعند أبي يوسف : لَا يَجُوزُ ؛ لأنَّ المنعَ لِحَقِّ الله ، فصار كالميراث

ومنها : أنْ يَكُونَ المُوصَى له موجوداً حتَّى لَوْ أَوصَى لِلجَنِينِ إِنْ كَانَ موجودًا عند الإيصاء ؛ يَصِحُ وَإِلَّا فَلَا ، وَإِنَّمَا يُعْرَفُ ذلكَ بِأَنْ وُلِدَ قَبلَ سَتَّةِ أَشهرٍ (غاية البيان نادرة الزمان في آخر الالوان لقوام الدين الأتقاني)

[ii] اعْلَمْ أَنَّ الوصية للحَمْلِ تَصِحُ ؛ لأنَّه من أهل استحقاق الحقوق، ولهذا يستحق الميراث ، والوَصِيَّةُ أُخْتُ الميراث (غاية البيان نادرة الزمان في آخر الالوان لقوام الدين الأتقاني)

[iii] وجملة الكلام فيه: ما قال الإمام الأسبيجابي في شرح الطحاوي

أما الوَصِيةُ بالحَمْلِ كما إذا أُوصَى لِرَجُلٍ بما في بَطْنِ جاريته ، وَلَمْ يَكُنْ ذلك الولد مِنَ المَوْلَى ، أَوْ أَوْصَى له بما في بَطْنِ دَابَّتِهِ إِذا عُلِمَ أَنه ثَابِتٌ موجودٌ في البَطْنِ وقت الوصية ؛ فالوصية جائزة ، ومعرفة ذلك بِأَنْ جَاءَتْ لأَقَلَّ مِنْ سَتَّةِ أَشْهُرٍ مِنْ وَقْتِ مَوْتِ المُوصِي (غاية البيان نادرة الزمان في آخر الالوان لقوام الدين الأتقاني)