Question: 

Could I take out an offset mortgage whereby i would avoid paying any interest on the loan if i’m certain that my savings will always be equal to or above the loan value. e,g. if the loan value is £100k, and my savings is also £100k or above, then I would avoid having to pay any interest payments and would just be paying back the loan amount each month.

[Question published as received.]

The Fatwa

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

The Answer

An offset mortgage where the savings balance fully offsets the mortgage balance is often referred to as a ‘100% offset mortgage’. Theoretically, this could imply that the homeowner would pay no interest on their mortgage and neither any interest on their savings because the mortgage interest charged would be equal to the interest earned on the savings.

However, in reality, there are slight anomalies due to the way credit and debit interest are calculated. Credit interest on savings accounts is typically calculated based on the actual number of days in the calendar month, while debit interest on mortgages is calculated by dividing the year into 12 equal parts, so each “month” is assumed to have 30.4 days.[i]

Therefore, even with a 100% offset mortgage, there will always  be a small amount of interest charged or earned due to these differences in calculation methods. In essence, it’s near impossible to achieve a truly interest-free arrangement with this type of mortgage.

Even if by some rare chance, a 100% offset mortgage were to be structured in a way that completely avoided interest charges or earnings, the transaction would still be considered impermissible.

In an offset mortgage, the balance in one’s savings or current account is offset against the mortgage balance to reduce or eradicate the amount of interest charged on the mortgage. However, this is achieved by the lender reducing or trading the interest charged on the mortgage by the interest earned on the balance in a savings or current account. Therefore, this is still seen as charging interest, which is of course prohibited.

When a customer is required to deposit money into a savings account to neutralise or nullify mortgage interest rates, he or she is in essence offsetting their interest payments with a loan to the bank in the form of a deposited amount. Therefore, the transaction in question is still considered to be usurious (ribawī).  In principle,  any contract wherein there is a requirement to lend, to receive additional benefit(s) is a form of Ribā.

A famous juristic maxim to be understood: “Any loan which draws an increment is Ribā”. (Ibn Abī Shaybah). ‘Allamah Marghināni (d.593 AH), and other jurists describe Ribā as the unjustified excess which one of the transacting parties assume entitlement to, either contractually, virtue of custom , or by pre-agreement.

The warnings against Ribā are severe, the Qur’an and the Sunnah state:

“O you who believe! Remain conscious of Allah, and give up all outstanding gains from usury, if you are [truly] believers; for if you do it not, then know that you are at war with Allah and His Messenger. But if you repent, then you shall be entitled to [the return of] your principal. You will do no wrong, and neither will you be wronged.” [Surat Al-Baqarah, 278-279]

The Prophet Muhammad (salallahu alayhi wasallam) said regarding Ribā:

“Cursed is the one who takes interest, and the one who pays it, the one who records it, and the two who (accept to be the) witnesses for signing it.” [Muslim]

And Almighty Allah Alone Knows Best 

Maulana Ammar Y Badat
Trainee Mufti

Reviewed and approved by
Mufti Faraz Adam
Darul Iftaa Muadh ibn Jabal
www.fatwa-centre.com | www.darulfiqh.com 

DISCLAIMER:

The views and opinions expressed in this answer belong only to the author and do not in any way represent or reflect the views of any institutions to which he may be affiliated.

Arguments and ideas propounded in this answer are based on the juristic interpretations and reasoning of the author. Given that contemporary issues and interpretations of contemporary issues are subjective in nature, another Mufti may reach different conclusions to the one expressed by the author. Whilst every effort has been taken to ensure total accuracy and soundness from a Shari’ah perspective, the author is open to any correction or juristic guidance. On the event of any juristic shortcomings, the author will retract any or all of the conclusions expressed within this answer.

The Shari’ah ruling given herein is based specifically on the scenario in question.  The author bears no responsibility towards any party that acts or does not act on this answer and is exempted from any and all forms of loss or damage.  This answer may not be used as evidence in any court of law without prior written consent from the author.  Consideration is only given and is restricted to the specific links provided, the author does not endorse nor approve of any other content the website may contain.

واما الرِّبَا فِي الدّين فَهُوَ على وَجْهَيْن احدها ان يَبِيع رجلا مَتَاعا بِالنَّسِيئَةِ فَلَمَّا حل الاجل طَالبه رب الدّين فَقَالَ الْمَدْيُون زِدْنِي فِي الاجل ازدك فِي الدَّرَاهِم فَفعل فان ذَلِك رَبًّاوَالثَّانِي ان يَقُول رب الدّين للمديون قبل مَحل الاجل اعطني مَالِي فاحط عَنْك بَعْضًا من ديني فَفعل فان ذَلِك رَبًّا للمديون وَلَا يحل لَهُ ذَلِك (النتف في الفتاوى)

لأن الربا هو الفضل المستحق لأحد المتعاقدين في المعاوضة الخالي عن عوض شرط فيه، ولا يعتبر الوصف لأنه لا يعد تفاوتا عرفا، أو لأن في اعتباره سد باب البياعات (الهداية في شرح بداية المبتدي)

قال مُحَمَّدٌ رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى في كِتَابِ الصَّرْفِ إنَّ أَبَا حَنِيفَةَ رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى كان يَكْرَهُ كُلُّ قَرْضٍ جَرَّ مَنْفَعَةٍ قال الْكَرْخِيُّ هذا إذَا كانت الْمَنْفَعَةُ مَشْرُوطَةً في الْعَقْدِ بِأَنْ أَقْرَضَ غَلَّةً لِيَرُدَّ عليه صِحَاحًا أو ما أَشْبَهَ ذلك فَإِنْ لم تَكُنْ الْمَنْفَعَةُ مَشْرُوطَةً في الْعَقْدِ فَأَعْطَاهُ الْمُسْتَقْرِضُ أَجْوَدَ مِمَّا عليه فَلَا بَأْسَ بِهِ وَكَذَلِكَ إذَا أَقْرَضَ رَجُلًا دَرَاهِمَ أو دَنَانِيرَلِيَشْتَرِيَ الْمُسْتَقْرِضُ من الْمُقْرِضِ مَتَاعًا بِثَمَنٍ غَالٍ فَهُوَ مَكْرُوهٌ وَإِنْ لم يَكُنْ شِرَاءُ الْمَتَاعِ مَشْرُوطًا في الْقَرْضِ وَلَكِنَّ الْمُسْتَقْرِضَ اشْتَرَى من الْمُقْرِضِ بَعْدَ الْقَرْضِ بِثَمَنٍ غَالٍ فَعَلَى قَوْلِ الْكَرْخِيِّ لَا بَأْسَ بِهِ وَذَكَرَ الْخَصَّافُ في كِتَابِهِ وقال ما أُحِبُّ له ذلك وَذَكَرَ شَمْسُ الْأَئِمَّةِ الْحَلْوَانِيُّ أَنَّهُ حَرَامٌ وَذَكَرَ مُحَمَّدٌ رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ تَعَالَى في كِتَابِ الصَّرْفِ أَنَّ السَّلَفَ كَانُوا يَكْرَهُونَ ذلك (فتاوى الهندية)

 مطلب كل قرض جر نفعا حرام  قوله ( كل قرض جر نفعا حرام ) أي إذا كان مشروطا كما علم مما نقله عن البحر(حاشية رد المختار على الدر المختار)

[i] https://www.barclays.co.uk/help/mortgages/managing-mortgage/savings-offset-interest/#:~:text=our%20help%20centre-,If%20I%20have%20exactly%20the%20same%20in%20savings%20as%20I,no%20interest%20on%20your%20savings.